Should India Discard The No-First Use Nuclear Doctrine ?

A #policy  of No First Use (NFU) of nuclear weapons has long characterised India’s #security  doctrine. Official declarations of that policy can be dated back to at least 1994, when the Government of India delivered a non-paper to #pakistan  that included, among other things, an agreement on no first use of the nuclear capability. The country’s formal #nuclear  doctrine from January 2003 includes a no first use pledge, albeit with caveats. The #Indian #diplomats  have often advanced the country’s commitment not to use #nuclearweapons  first as a proof of the country being a “responsible” state and thereby a way to resist any pressures to sign any treaties that would affect its #nuclear arsenal. It would seem then, that the NFU is a core element of India’s nuclear weapons posture.

On the other hand, the #NFU commitment has constantly been challenged and reviewed by various quarters, including no less than the Indian leadership. On several occasions, various high-level officials have frequently floated the idea that India should revisit its commitment to such a policy. Indeed, at the very time that the Government announced that it had adopted a formal doctrine, the #nationalsecurity  Advisory Board, as it was constituted then, had recommended that the country -

“may consider withdrawing from this commitment as the other nuclear weapons states have not accepted this policy”

Additionally, India is wedged between two nations with territorial ambitions and which maintain a strategic alliance - Pakistan, a nuclear-armed state with no clear doctrine or policy and #China, a world hegemon in waiting with an expanding nuclear arsenal. 

In that context, does the No-first-use nuclear policy even make sense for India when looked at from the operational perspective?

Explore More at - www.argumentativeindians.com

DISCLAIMER:
We invite thought leaders from across the ideological spectrum. The guests in our sessions express their independent views and opinions. Argumentative Indians does not profess to subscribe, agree or endorse the same or be in anyway responsible for the stance, words and comments of our guests.